Genetically organism Essay

Everyone in the creation competes in his/her way to reserve standards through which he/she apprize reach themselves and their loved ones with provender. It is the basic necessity any benignant universe requires daily from kindred until death. Today in the modern eld different forms of many foods bem drug abuse evolved ranging from constituent(a) foods to patrimonial everyy change foods. Since the cistrontically modified foods have taken over the foodstuff they atomic number 18 known to be greater in resistance to pesticides and viruses, provide higher(prenominal) nutritional value and have a longer expiration date. Lastly, these foods are sell at cheaper prices in comparison to the organic foods.However, the potential risks of these foods are still being debated all over the man. The three reasons wherefore the genetically engineered food should be designate sepa steply are the wellness hazards, apparitional ethical concerns, and economic concerns involved. The reason why genetically modified foods should be designate singly from organic foods are the health hazards involved in the business. The major health hazard involved in the non-labeling of genetic foods is that people all over the arena have allergies to particular lawsuits of ingredients employ in the manufacturing of the foods.The genetically modified foods include soybean, maize, chicory, potato, squash, oilseed rape (canola), pineapples, and strawberries. 1 genetically modified foods can military campaign health sicknesss such as cancers, a newly discovered disease Morgellons, and former(a)(a) allergies. Without any specific labeling, the rate at which these diseases can occur manifold be mystify people allergic to trustworthy genes used in these foods, and there is no early(a) way to determines these foods contain these genes or not. A recent article published in Lancet examined the effects of GM potatoes on the digestive tract in rats.This acquire claimed that there were appreci suitable differences in the intestines of rats supply GM potatoes and rats feed unmodified potatoes. many children in the US and Europe have developed life-threatening allergies to peanuts and other foods. thither is a hypothesis that introducing a gene into a plant may pee-pee a new allergen or cause an allergic reaction in unresistant individuals. (Raab, Grobe 2009) 2 The quoted article above examines the differences between the Rats that cater on organic make grow of potatoes and the ones that fed on the GM potatoes.The rats that fed on GM foods developed precancerous electric cell summation in their digestive tracts, moderate developments of their brains, livers, and testicles. They also faced en monumentald pancreas and intestines, and suffered insubordinate system damage. The quote also demonstrates the calamity of the harmful expression effects that GM foods can cause to future human generations. The possible solution to minimize these side e ffects is that Extensive testing of GM foods should be required to avoid the possibility of harm to consumers with food allergies. Labeling of GM foods and food products allow acquire new importance. before buying a certain GM product, people pass on be able to determine if they are allergic to its ingredients or not. Another reason why genetically modified foods should be labeled separately from organic foods is the spectral ethical concerns involved in the production. Different unearthly groups repeal themselves from eating certain types of animal products. For example, Muslims do not eat any type of enzymes extracted from Pork. 3 Thus, using genes to create traces of genetic cloth from pork in GM foods and plants without labeling them could cause a stir in the Muslim sect.Another ethical concern is that animal(prenominal) rights can harmfully be moved(p) by excessive manufacturing of Genetic Foods. For example, Sheep effrontery to a greater extent powerful hormones coul d suffer problems relating to growth and problems in digestive systems. Without specific labeling on foods, animals being tested cannot be identified, and this could sensation to further malpractices by large corporations. honourable and religious concerns include the belief that the engineering involved is unnatural, and preoccupations regarding the consumption of religiously disal number one ingredients from certain animals.These new technologies, it is argued, violate religious freedom by placing a core on those who follow strict religious dietary laws. The politics is not constitutionally obligated to make accommodations in estimate of religious groups that are incidentally affect by neutral rules. Accordingly, the neutral finis of not labeling genetically modified foods met this constitutional standard and was not subjected to a more rigorous constitutional adjudication test. (Lietz, 2000) 4.The quoted excerpt above from the Harvard law review emphasizes the importance of the labeling on genetically modified foods because without explanation of how these foods are manufactured, it is unethical and unfavorable to religious and pagan groups that restrict themselves from practices in consumption of certain ingredients included in these foods. In other words, the use of these technologies is harming the religion freedom of people. 4 The government of United States cling tos the non-labeling by not bye laws that require rigorous tests on GM foods because it is believed that there are already laws that protect religious groups.The third reason why genetically modified foods should be labeled separately is the economic concerns involved in the production. The main economic concern is that the world food market could be monopolized by large multinational corporations that control the production and distribution of genetically manufactured seeds. If this happens, they would be able manipulate governments to pass laws that assumet require companies to l abel their GM foods. 5 Monopolization get out addition prices of seeds and swoon teentsy level farming. GMOs are the products of large corporations and considered intellectual property.Thus, they are protected by patents and copyrights. This message that if farmers want to use genetically modified crops, they must buy it from a corporation. If the world relies solely on GMOs, this means that these corporations will control the worlds food supply, leading to the monopolization of food. The use of GMOs is driving out the need for small farmers. These small farmers are forced to pound to GMOs in order to compete with other GMO farmers, but in the process, they are oppress to the control of the corporation that produced the GMOs.(Barton, 2002) 6 The above career was taken from a research astir(predicate) non labeling consequences published in the Harvard Law reexamine that extrapolates the consequences if the food industry is monopolized. It explains that if this happens, th e patents and copyrights will increase prices of foods massively and abolish the system of low scale farming. Each and every farmer will need to rely on large corporations to grow crops, and GM foods will be seasonal that means in every season the seeds will expire and costs of storage and harvesting will sky rocket.All in all, the corporations will completely take over the food sourcing misleading people in what they produce for the sole purpose of profits. Thus, it will be considered legal and ethical. Regulations should be passed by governments all around the world that strictly assert on the labeling of genetically manufactured foods. Without labeling on the Genetically special Foods the health hazards, religious ethical concerns, and economical concerns will increase over time. Therefore, instead of looking at the future from the eyes of the economic benefit, the world should look at the consequences this evolution could lead. workings Cited Page 1. Genetically change Food. Crowdsourcing Questions & Answers. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 May 2011. 2. 6Barton. GMF Labeling Issues. Harvard Law Review, Winter 2002. Web. 18 May 2011. . 3. Daneil, Genetically Modified Foods break up wellness Channel. Home kick downstairs Health Channel. Deakin University. Web. 18 May 2011. .4. 2Grobe, and Raab. Genetically Modified Foods Better Health Channel. Home Better Health Channel. Deakin University. Web. 18 May 2011. . 5. 4 Lietz, higher up note 11, at 416 Julie Teel, Regulating Genetically Modified Products and Processes An Overview of Approaches, 8 N. Y. U. ENVTL. L. J. 649, 660-61 (2000) 6. Genetically Modified Food. Crowdsourcing Questions & Answers. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 May 2011. .